Could there have been Nothing?: Against Metaphysical by Geraldine Coggins

By Geraldine Coggins

May possibly there were not anything? is the 1st book-length examine of metaphysical nihilism – the declare that there might have been no concrete items. It seriously analyses the controversy round nihilism and similar questions about the metaphysics of attainable worlds, concrete items and ontological dependence.

Show description

Read or Download Could there have been Nothing?: Against Metaphysical Nihilism PDF

Best metaphysics books

Metaphysics: A Very Short Introduction

Metaphysics is among the conventional 4 major branches of philosophy, along ethics, good judgment and epistemology. it's also a space that maintains to draw and carry a fascination for plenty of humans but it really is linked to being advanced and summary. For a few it's linked to the magical or non secular.

Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: and the Letter to Marcus Herz, February 1772 (2nd Edition)

Version Description

James W. Ellington (tr. )

This version of Prolegomena comprises Kant’s letter of February, 1772 to Marcus Herz, a momentous record during which Kant relates the development of his pondering and publicizes that he's now able to current a critique of natural reason.

Description of the Work

Two hundred years after his demise, Kant continues to be some of the most very important smooth philosophers. The Prolegomena is the perfect advent to Kant's certain account of the character human wisdom, in accordance with which we actively form the area as we all know it.

"Kant declared that the Prolegomena are for using either inexperienced persons and academics as an heuristic method to find a technology of metaphysics. in contrast to different sciences, metaphysics has now not but attained common and everlasting wisdom. There aren't any criteria to tell apart fact from errors. Kant requested, "Can metaphysics also be attainable? "

David Hume investigated the matter of the starting place of the concept that of causality. Is the idea that of causality really self reliant of expertise or is it realized from adventure? Hume mistakenly tried to derive the idea that of causality from adventure. He proposal that causality was once quite according to seeing gadgets that have been regularly jointly in prior event. If causality isn't depending on adventure, even though, then it can be utilized to metaphysical items, akin to an all-powerful God or an immortal Soul. Kant claimed to have logically deduced how causality and different natural recommendations originate from human figuring out itself, now not from experiencing the exterior world.

Unlike the Critique of natural cause, which used to be written within the synthetical variety, Kant wrote the Prolegomena utilizing the analytical technique. He divided the query concerning the hazard of metaphysics as a technology into 3 elements. In so doing, he investigated the 3 difficulties of the potential of natural arithmetic, natural average technological know-how, and metaphysics generally. His consequence allowed him to figure out the boundaries of natural cause and to reply to the query in regards to the probability of metaphysics as a technology. " - Wiki


Lewis White Beck claimed that the executive curiosity of the Prolegomena to the scholar of philosophy is "the method during which it is going past and opposed to the perspectives of up to date positivism. " He wrote: "The Prolegomena is, furthermore, the easiest of all introductions to that massive and imprecise masterpiece, the Critique of natural cause. … It has an exemplary lucidity and wit, making it special between Kant's higher works and uniquely appropriate as a textbook of the Kantian philosophy. " Ernst Cassirer asserted that "the Prolegomena inaugurates a brand new kind of actually philosophical reputation, unmatched for readability and passion. " Schopenhauer, in 1819, declared that the Prolegomena used to be "the best and so much understandable of Kant's vital works, that's a long way too little learn, for it immensely enables the learn of his philosophy. "

Aristotle on Metaphysics

Aristotle may be an important determine in philosophy. each critical reader of philosophy will stumble upon the Metaphysics, but earlier there has no longer been an introductory publication to assist clarify the customarily tough rules that come up within the textual content. This GuideBook seems to be on the Metaphysics thematically and takes the reader throughout the major arguments present in the booklet.

Extra info for Could there have been Nothing?: Against Metaphysical Nihilism

Example text

Secondly, although there is obviously some sort of very important relationship between space-time points and space-time regions, it isn’t the relationship that a set has to its members. Perhaps it’s a mereological relationship of a whole and its parts. Rodriguez-Pereyra even uses these terms earlier in the paper saying 22 Could There Have Been Nothing? . 28 The use of the term ‘includes’ does not usually signify a set-membership relation. It adds credence to the thought that space-time regions are mereological sums of space-time points rather than sets of those points.

2). However, Baldwin claims that the falsity of C is not a threat to (A3). This is because if we take the property denoted by F to be non-existence, that does not provide a counterexample to C. Properties such as ‘is at least as heavy as anyone else’ do provide counterexamples to C. This is because this kind of property involves an ordering of a domain of more than one object. Non-existence is not the sort of property that involves this sort of ordering. So although C is false if F denotes the property ‘is at least as heavy as anyone else’ there is no obvious reason to think C is false if F denotes non-existence.

It seems that the null individual is extremely problematic in and of itself. And furthermore, even if we did accept its existence, it’s not clear that it alone could constitute a Lewis-world and so it seems that this attempt to make Lewisian compositionalism compatible with metaphysical nihilism cannot succeed. So what other kind of relationship could hold between worlds and concrete objects? I use the phrase ‘the container view of worlds’ for the claim that the world is not composed of the other objects it contains, rather it is another object that contains them.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.90 of 5 – based on 43 votes