By Teresa Satterfield, Christina Tortora, Diana Cresti
This quantity emerges from the twenty ninth annual convention of the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL) held on the college of Michigan, Ann Arbor, in 1999. themes coated contain: on changing into a clitic; the prenominal possessive in romance; at the nature of naked nouns in Haitian Creole; the semantics of Spanish unfastened relations; cut up topic pronoun paradigms; non-lexical "if"; and Romanian nominal constitution, proforms and genitive case checking between others.
Read Online or Download Current Issues in Romance Languages: Selected Papers from the 29th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (Lsrl), Ann Arbor, 8-11 April 1999 PDF
Best foreign languages books
Your all-audio survival software for conversational talent in sensible abilities, from greetings to go back and forth round, reserving a inn room to procuring and consuming out converse Swedish with self assurance comprises ten themes (with conversations every one) with particular goals. every one subject introduces 15 key phrases (plus a few cognates), 3 structures/useful words, and one major grammar element.
This edited quantity brings jointly fourteen unique contributions to the on-going debate approximately what's attainable in contact-induced language switch. The authors current a few new vistas on language touch which characterize new advancements within the field.
In the 1st a part of the quantity, the focal point is on method and conception. Thomas Stolz defines the research of Romancisation methods as a really promising laboratory for language-contact orientated study and theoretical paintings established thereon. The reader is proficient concerning the huge scale tasks on loanword typology within the contribution through Martin Haspelmath and on contact-induced grammatical swap carried out by way of Jeanette Sakel and Yaron Matras. Christel Stolz studies procedures of gender-assignment to mortgage nouns in German and German-based forms. The typology of personal loan verbs is the subject of the contribution through Søren Wichmann and Jan Wohlgemuth. within the articles through Wolfgang Wildgen and Klaus Zimmermann, noticeably new techniques to the speculation of language touch are recommend: a dynamic version and a constructivism-based thought, respectively.
The moment a part of the amount is devoted to extra empirically orientated reviews which check out language-contact constellations with a Romance donor language and a non-European recipient language. Spanish-Amerindian (Guaraní, Otomí, Quichua) contacts are investigated within the comparative examine by means of Dik Bakker, Jorge Gómez-Rendón and Ewald Hekking. Peter Bakker and Robert A. Papen talk about the impact exerted by means of French at the indigenous languages ofCanada. the level of the Portuguese effect at the Amazonian language Kulina is studied by way of Stefan Dienst. John Holm appears to be like on the validity of the speculation that certain morphology typically falls sufferer to Creolization procedures and attracts his proof mostly from Portuguese-based Creoles. For Austronesia, borrowings and calques from French nonetheless are an understudied phenomenon. Claire Moyse-Faurie’s contribution to this subject is therefore a pioneer’s paintings. equally, Françoise Rose and Odile Renault-Lescure offer us with clean information on language touch in French Guiana. the ultimate article of this assortment by way of Mauro Tosco demonstrates that the Italianization of languages of the previous Italian colonies in East Africa is simply weak.
This quantity offers the reader with new insights on all degrees of language-contact comparable experiences. the amount addresses specifically a readership that has a robust curiosity in language touch ordinarily and its repercussions at the phonology, grammar and lexicon of the recipient languages. specialists of Romance language touch, and experts of Amerindian languages, Afro-Asiatic languages, Austronesian languages and Pidgins and Creoles will locate the amount hugely priceless.
This quantity offers chosen papers from the thirty sixth LSRL convention held at Rutgers college in 2006. It includes twenty-two articles of present ways to the learn of Romance linguistics. famous researchers current their findings in parts akin to of syntax and semantics, phonology, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics.
This scarce antiquarian booklet is a facsimile reprint of the unique. because of its age, it could possibly comprise imperfections akin to marks, notations, marginalia and fallacious pages. simply because we think this paintings is culturally vital, we've got made it to be had as a part of our dedication for safeguarding, keeping, and selling the world's literature in reasonable, top of the range, smooth versions which are precise to the unique paintings.
Extra info for Current Issues in Romance Languages: Selected Papers from the 29th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (Lsrl), Ann Arbor, 8-11 April 1999
The paper is organized as follows: first, Chierchia's typology and its grounding assumptions are summarized. Second, the Haitian Creole data is examined. Third, empirical evidence for the presence of a null determiner in HC bare nominals are presented and an analysis of its syntax and semantics is sketched. 2. Theoretical Background In formal semantics, nouns are commonly assumed to denote predicates of type
The relevant part of the structure of (9a) is shown in (15). The FocusP is not present in (15) because I assume, following Rizzi, that TopicP and FocusP are projected only if needed, when a constituent bears topic or focus features. (15) Crucially for my argument, the data show that an overt complementizer is obligatory when a topic is present. I believe that the explanation that assumes that no CP is projected when the que is not realized is preferable to the most obvious alternative, which would be to consider the existence of a null complementizer in these Spanish embedded complements.
It seems thus fair to conclude that plural distinctions in HC are essentially limited to the pronominal domain and, consequently that the language displays no inflectional plural morphology. In (12) below, the pronominal distinction has been used to probe the singular/plural construal of HC bare nouns. Note that, interestingly, both the singular and the plural pronouns are possible, at least when bare nouns have a generic reading. (12) a. " b. " d. " e. " f. Vwayèl chante. Yo gen bel vwa (Dejean: (1985:3)) "Vowels can sing.